Soil organic carbon sequestration: Modelling diversification in the Po Valley
Source PublicationScience of The Total Environment
Primary AuthorsCerasuolo, Vanino, Piccini et al.

Researchers assert that shifting away from monocultures in Italy's Po Valley can significantly enhance soil organic carbon sequestration, though the magnitude of this benefit remains tethered to local environmental variables. The study relies on a hybrid approach, merging field data with the ECOSSE biophysical model to project outcomes under various climate futures.
This investigation marks the first application of ECOSSE specifically for diversified systems in this region. The authors integrated novel rotations—introducing peas, reduced tillage, and organic amendments—alongside slurry management data. It is a complex methodological stack. They employed process-based modelling, machine learning, and spatial interpolation to triangulate results. While the integration of these methods provides a detailed projection, modelling always introduces uncertainty. The reliance on projected climate scenarios means these findings are simulations rather than historical records.
Variables affecting soil organic carbon sequestration
The data suggests that diversified systems outperform conventional monocultures in retaining carbon. Soils with initially low carbon content appear to gain the most. However, this is not a universal remedy. The extent of sequestration fluctuated considerably based on soil characteristics and specific climate projections. Machine learning analysis identified temperature, rainfall, and evapotranspiration as the primary drivers of variance. Consequently, while the trend is positive, the precise volume of carbon stored is volatile.
These results offer region-specific data for policy frameworks, such as payment-for-ecosystem-services schemes. Yet, the variability emphasises a key constraint: broad-brush strategies may fail. Effective implementation likely requires site-specific planning rather than a uniform mandate. The study implies that while diversification is a strong tool, it is not a guaranteed fix for all soil types under all future climates.