Genetics & Molecular Biology15 December 2025

scRR-seq: Scrutinising a New Single-cell Multi-omics Approach to S-phase Dynamics

Source PublicationNature Communications

Primary AuthorsPoonperm, Yoneda, Imada et al.

Visualisation for: scRR-seq: Scrutinising a New Single-cell Multi-omics Approach to S-phase Dynamics
Visualisation generated via Synaptic Core

The authors present scRR-seq as a novel protocol capable of simultaneous high-resolution DNA replication profiling and total RNA sequencing. While the data indicates improved monitoring of S-phase progression, this represents a methodological proof-of-concept rather than a broad clinical application. The primary innovation lies in the integration of existing frameworks to fill a specific analytical gap.

These results were observed under controlled laboratory conditions, so real-world performance may differ.

This addition to the single-cell multi-omics toolkit aims to resolve a persistent blind spot: the inability to track gene expression changes precisely during DNA synthesis. Previous methods have often failed to correlate transcriptional activity with exact replication timing. By measuring the percentage of the genome replicated, the researchers argue they can now determine the specific stage of the S-phase for any given cell.

Assessing Single-cell Multi-omics Precision

The technical architecture of scRR-seq combines scRepli-seq and scRamDA-seq. When applied concurrently, the study reports that data quality remains comparable to that of the individual assays. This is significant. Often, combining modalities degrades the signal-to-noise ratio. Here, the authors demonstrate that the method can identify progression markers and detect copy-number variation (CNV) even in non-replicating cells.

The study asserts that scRR-seq outperforms alternative DNA/RNA-seq methods across several benchmarks. However, one must note that performance metrics in controlled environments do not always translate to complex tissue samples. The utility of this method depends heavily on the specific biological question being asked.

Methodological Constraints and Future Utility

While the method accurately measures replication timing in this dataset, widespread adoption requires validation across diverse cell types. The current results suggest robustness. They do not guarantee it. The ability to analyse haplotype-specific data is a strong feature, yet the complexity of the protocol may limit throughput. Consequently, while scRR-seq offers a sharper lens for examining the S-phase, it remains a specialised tool for specific molecular inquiries rather than a universal solution.

Cite this Article (Harvard Style)

Poonperm et al. (2025). 'scRR-seq: Scrutinising a New Single-cell Multi-omics Approach to S-phase Dynamics'. Nature Communications. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64688-1

Source Transparency

This intelligence brief was synthesised by The Synaptic Report's autonomous pipeline. While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, professional due diligence requires verifying the primary source material.

Verify Primary Source
methodologybiotechnologydetecting copy-number variation in single cellshaplotype-specific single-cell sequencing techniques