Preserving the Self: A Novel Rasmussen Encephalitis Treatment Strategy
Source PublicationActa Neurologica Belgica
Primary AuthorsZafar, Zahoor, Cobb et al.

Why does nature allow a system as sophisticated as the human brain to spiral into such precise, rhythmic self-destruction? It is a question that haunts the study of Rasmussen encephalitis (RE), a rare, immune-mediated disorder where the body turns against one hemisphere of the brain. The result is often Epilepsia Partialis Continua (EPC)—a relentless, focal motor seizure that refuses to quit. For decades, the most effective solution has been brutally simple: disconnect the offending hemisphere entirely. It stops the fire, certainly. But if the inflammation sits in the dominant hemisphere, the cost is the patient's voice, language, and finer cognition.
We are forced to ask if evolution has left us a backdoor.
Evolutionary redundancy and Rasmussen encephalitis treatment
The brain is not a monolith; it is a federation of interconnected states. Evolution favoured this modularity because it allows for complex, parallel processing. However, RE exploits these very connections, using neural highways to broadcast chaos. A recent case study involving a 13-year-old male challenges the notion that we must destroy the infrastructure to stop the riot. This patient, suffering from drug-resistant EPC in his language-dominant left hemisphere, faced a grim choice. Ten medications, steroids, and immunotherapies had failed. Hemispheric disconnection would likely silence his ability to speak.
Instead, clinicians pursued a less destructive path: Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS). This device does not act like a sledgehammer; it acts like a diplomat. Implanted directly over the seizure focus, it monitors electrical activity. When it detects the specific pattern of a seizure, it delivers a counter-stimulation to disrupt the signal.
The results were measurable and stark. Before the implant, the patient endured between 4,000 and 6,000 long seizure episodes daily. Following the procedure, the device recordings showed a drop to approximately 600 per day. Physically, the propagation of spasms to the neck and shoulder decreased by more than 50%. Crucially, the boy’s cognitive and language abilities remained stable over the 30-month observation period.
From measurements to implications
We must distinguish what was recorded from what this promises. The study measured a reduction in electrical noise and motor symptoms. It also recorded that the addition of the drug cenobamate correlated with further improvements. However, the broader implication is what matters here. The data suggests that neuromodulation could serve as a viable Rasmussen encephalitis treatment for patients who cannot afford to lose a hemisphere. It implies that we can exploit the brain's electrical nature to hold the immune system's assault at bay, preserving the self while managing the symptoms.
This is not a cure. The underlying immune attack persists. Yet, it represents a shift in strategy—using technology to negotiate a truce with our own biology, rather than accepting unconditional surrender.